Re: [council] SECOND ROUND BALLOT

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I have to agree with Lucy, there were enough warnings and possibilties
to cast ones votes. I for example used a telephone setup during
my vacation. If there weren't any technical problems I don't see why 
we should go through this process again.

Best,

tom

Am 21.06.2006 schrieb Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx:
> In all fairness, Glen sent out reminders for all council members to
> vote. In both rounds, those reminders prompted me to look for my ballot.
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Marilyn Cade
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 2:51 PM
> >To: 'kent crispin'; owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GNSO Council
> >Subject: Re: [council] SECOND ROUND BALLOT
> >
> >This response is not directed at technical staff. However, 
> >this situation with voting is a little strange. Three people 
> >did not receive ballots, although technical staff validate the 
> >sending of ballots and receipt but not in the mailbox of the 
> >intended recipient. 
> >
> >I ask that the election "team" work out a way to allow all 
> >councilors to vote. 
> >We have documented complaints about the flow and receipt of ballots. 
> >
> >This needs to be addressed by the General counsel, and adm 
> >staff responsible for managing the election, and a process 
> >addressed for councilors who did not receive the ballots but 
> >stated their intention to vote. 
> >
> >Let's not have a contested election over technical failures. 
> >
> >I voted in the first round and have a "sent" message in my 
> >email outbox. Yet when I asked for verification of receipt, my 
> >vote was not received. 
> >
> >The second round seems to have worked for me. 
> >
> >
> >
> >Marilyn
> >Regards,
> >Marilyn Cade
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: "'kent crispin'" <kent@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:57:00
> >To:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [council] SECOND ROUND BALLOT
> >
> >On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:58:18AM -0500, Kiyoshi I. Tsuru wrote:
> >> I haven't received my ballot either.
> >
> >Hi Kiyoshi
> >
> >Your ballot was definitely sent to you, and, according to my 
> >logs, successfully received by your mail server.  
> >Unfortunately, the election is now closed, and there is 
> >nothing further that can be done about it.  Had I known about 
> >your problem earlier it would have been very easy to send you 
> >another copy, but unfortunately, I didn't hear anything about 
> >a missing ballot until now.
> >
> >Your ballot was sent out at approximately 10 am PDT on June 
> >15; here are the log entries of the ballot being sent, and 
> >received by your mail server:
> >
> >Jun 15 10:01:27 greenriver sendmail[28416]: k5FH1Rlt028416: 
> >    from=<tally@xxxxxxxxx>, size=3438, class=0, nrcpts=1, 
> >    msgid=<200606151701.k5FH1RbC028415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
> >proto=ESMTP, 
> >    daemon=MTA, relay=greenriver [127.0.0.1]
> >
> >Jun 15 10:01:28 greenriver sendmail[28418]: k5FH1Rlt028416: 
> >    to=<ktsuru@xxxxxxxxxxx>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, 
> >mailer=esmtp, 
> >    pri=33438, relay=mail.bgmt.com.mx. [72.32.2.231], dsn=2.0.0, 
> >    stat=Sent (ok 1150390885 qp 5155)
> >
> >Once at your mail server, of course, I can't track it further.
> >
> >The logs record 201 messages that have been successfully 
> >delivered to ktsuru@xxxxxxxxxxx over the past month or so.  On 
> >two occasions, the messages were delayed a couple of hours; 
> >neither of these occasions was in the time frame of this election. 
> >
> >Best Regards
> >Kent Crispin
> >
> >-- 
> >kent@xxxxxxxxx    p: +1 310 823 9358  f: +1 310 823 8649
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w