RE: [council] IDN Food for Thought

[Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Bruce,

Thanks for your swift reaction and clarification. Well, this is
my personal contribution (no constituency has been even
consulted) put forward to my peers, in order to make sure I or
"we have captured the issues correctly." The principles or
axioms clearly crystallize and convey the status of that
understanding, and are not once again intended to be
recommedations as yet. If eventually, after our interactions on
the subject, including with the GAC, any of those make it to
step 7(d) as policy recommendations, then cheers.

Mawaki

--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello Mawaki,
> 
> 
> Thanks for your input.
> 
> Just a reminder that at this stage we are simply making sure
> we have
> captured the issues correctly, and then prioritise the issues
> to work
> on.
> 
> With reference to the policy development process in Annex A of
> the
> bylaws:
> http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#AnnexA 
> 
> We are still at step 2.
> 
> The purpose of the working group is to help us advance to step
> 3
> - vote on initiating a PDP, along with a terms of reference
> 
> We also need to identify how we will coordinate our work with
> the ccNSO
> which also has an interest in this area.
> 
> We are not yet at a point where we are seeking specific policy
> recommendations, axioms, principles etc.  This will happen in
> step 7 (d)
> where we collect constituency statements against a terms of
> reference.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
>