RE: [council] GNSO working group of volunteers IDN issues update

[Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Olof,
thank you for your reply... and just to clarify, though my
earlier confusion may be due to that I was neither in Wellington
nor on the call May 18, I have now understood the Decision 4. In
my previous email, I was not referring to the joint GNSO/ccNSO
working group, but to GNSO working group that we are forming now
with these volunteers as Bruce explained. I may interpret the
reason of your assumption (that I was referring to the former)
as it is obvious for you that all the volunteers will
participate in the GNSO working group anyway, which is fine.
So let's move ahead if no further misunderstanding.
Very best regards,

Mawaki

--- olof nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello Mawaki,
> Just to confirm - there is no order of preference in the list,
> nor is there
> any rule of first-come-first-served for the selection of the
> three GNSO
> members in the joint task force - that selection is one of the
> tasks (see 5
> below) of the working group.
> Very best regards
> Olof 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Mawaki Chango
> Sent: den 12 juni 2006 15:15
> To: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO working group of volunteers IDN
> issues update
> 
> Dear Glen,
> 
> I was just wondering if there is any order in the list below.
> I
> remember volunteering after you said there was only one
> volunteer, and then Bruce posted a reminder that there were
> registrar volunteers, too. So I suppose I should appear
> somewhere in the top tear, if this is meant to be by order of
> volunteering. And in case all the volunteers are not,
> eventually, going to be on the TF (it has not been clarified
> how
> the final list would be picked up), I suggest this list of
> volunteers be done in that order, thank you.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Mawaki
> 
> --- "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > [To council[at]gnso.icann.org]
> > 
> > Dear Council Members,
> > 
> > Please note the added volunteers to the GNSO working
> > group:
> > The registrar members are:
> > 
> > - Bruce Tonkin, Melbourne IT
> > - Werner Staub, CORE (registrar) and .cat
> > - Yoav Keren, Domain The Net Technologies (registrar)
> > - Paul Diaz, Network Solutions
> > 
> > Sophia Bekele, CBS International, and Nominating Committee
> > appointee to
> > the GNSO Council
> > 
> > Avri Doria, Nominating Committee appointee to the GNSO
> Council
> > 
> > Ram Mohan, Afilias (operator for .info, .org, .mobi, and
> .in)
> > 
> > Cary Karp, gTLD Registries representative to the  GNSO
> Council
> > 
> > June Seo, gTLD Registries representative to the  GNSO
> Council
> > 
> > Alistair Dixon,  Telstra Clear Ltd., and CBUC representative
> > to the
> > GNSO Council + other CBUC participants not yet named.
> > 
> > Marilyn Cade, CBUC representative to the  GNSO Council
> > 
> > Mawaki Chango, NCUC representative to the  GNSO Council
> > 
> > Charles Shaban,  TALAL ABU-GHAZALEH & CO.International
> (TAGI)
> > IPC 
> > representative.
> > 
> > Please contact me if there are still names to add. We would
> > like to 
> > confirm the list as soon as possible.
> > 
> > Thank you very much,
> > Kind regards.
> > 
> > Glen
> > 
> > Decision 4: That the GNSO Council forms a GNSO working group
> > of
> > volunteers, conversant with the IDN issues raised in the IDN
> > issues report.
> > The purpose of the working group would be to:
> > 
> > (1) review the Issues Report,
> > 
> > (2) prioritise the policy issues in the Issues Report for
> > further work,
> > 
> > (3) develop the terms of reference for an initial policy
> > development
> > process in the area of IDNs within the GNSO,
> > 
> > (4) propose ways of interacting with ICANN groups such as
> the
> > President's Advisory Committee on IDNs, the GAC, ALAC, SSAC
> > and other
> > related groups in ICANN, and
> > 
> > (5) select three representatives to interact with the three
> > ccNSO
> > representatives to form a separate joint GNSO/ccNSO working
> > group to:
> > 
> > (5.1) agree on the priority issues and determine whether to
> > examine the
> > issues as a single "joint" PDP, or as two separate PDPs
> > 
> > (5.2) provide a report to the GNSO and ccNSO Councils with
> > recommendations for terms of reference of one or more PDPs,
> > and the
> > mechanisms for coordination with other parts of ICANN
> > The group would aim to have recommendations completed by the
> > end of July
> > 2006.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Glen de Saint Géry
> > GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> > gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> > http://gnso.icann.org
> > 
> 
> 
>