<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest
- To: "'David W. Maher'" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>, "'Marilyn Cade'" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest
- From: "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:24:45 -0700
- Cc: "'John Jeffrey'" <john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Bruce Tonkin'" <bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20060607143442.022944d0@pir.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcaKalHKp9jCKrF5RECxwJiXey3sBQASHMWQ
I read Marilyn's statement below as a fairly clear statement of interest.
She is consulting with/representing Overstock and AT&T with regard to their
desires to obtain single letter domains. Perhaps I'm being obtuse, David,
but what more are you seeking? Are you asking her for more details on these
engagements or are you suggesting that she has other engagements that she
hasn't disclosed?
Bret
>In Brussels, I named my clients related to the single letter names in
>our discussion, and again, yesterday, on the call I stated that the
>clients for the area of reserved names were AT&T and Overstock.com. As
>it turns out, AT&T is not interested in single letters, but "symbols".
>Not to bore everyone here but symbols have different technological
>issues than single letters and thus it is very unlikely that there
>would be any discussion feasible of releasing symbols of any nature.
>
>I'm not sure if you are asking if I am trying to represent clients, but
>without compensation, with the idea that they pay me for "outcomes". If
>that is the question, then no. Not the case.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|