<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] GNSO Council Election Interviews
- To: Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx, names council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council Election Interviews
- From: Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:53:26 -0400
- In-reply-to: <D981DAC077157C4098098372A7349D7D03BBF21D@daebe102.NOE.Nokia.com>
- References: <D981DAC077157C4098098372A7349D7D03BBF21D@daebe102.NOE.Nokia.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
Avri's
Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Which one...Marilyn's or Avri's?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Ken Stubbs
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 4:30 PM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council Election Interviews
i am much more comfortable with the approach outlined below..
ken stubbs
Avri Doria wrote:
On 29 maj 2006, at 17.02, Marilyn Cade wrote:
Are you planning to allow each constituency a question or two, or
should we submit questions to Glen, that can be organized into
categories?
while I have several questions in mind, I would prefer to listen to
what someone has to say before framing a question, as it is quite
possible that my question would be answered or obviated by something
the candidate said in a statement or in response to someone else's
question. Likewise a question might only occur to me once i heard a
statement or the answer to someone else question.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|