<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] FW: Regarding nominations for ICANN Board seat 14
- To: <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] FW: Regarding nominations for ICANN Board seat 14
- From: <Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 00:59:19 -0500
- In-reply-to: <000b01c676ed$8333bad0$331fa8c0@CCKLLP.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcZyIjq4gKdUcFtxRSCFz8PkrXYVGAAAAtgAATK3LVAAC5gAIA==
- Thread-topic: [council] FW: Regarding nominations for ICANN Board seat 14
I think that is an excellent suggestion and is absolutely necessary in
order for us to get a clear idea of possible/potential conflicts.
Lucy
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of ext Bret Fausett
>Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 2:30 AM
>To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [council] FW: Regarding nominations for ICANN Board seat
14
>
>Could we ask that all of those intending to stand for election submit a
>disclosure statement similar to the one we council members completed
earlier
>this year? It would be helpful to know whether prospective candidates
might
>face recusal on future Board votes.
>
> Bret
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|