<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Regarding data collected and the purpose of collecting data
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Regarding data collected and the purpose of collecting data
- From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:43:27 -0300
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20060411233115.32637.qmail@web54703.mail.yahoo.com> <024301c65dc2$21723810$7801a8c0@harris2> <443C49A6.9010600@tucows.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Ross,
I was expecting you... You have a point there,
I wonder why it took so long? Hmmmm.....
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Regarding data collected and the purpose of
collecting data
Anthony Harris wrote:
4) Your repeated references to the problem of access
to data have been exhaustively discussed within the
Whois task force, actually since mid 2001.... Tiered
access for entitled parties is of course a natural solution.
(And we did think of it quite a while back!)
Which is one very good reason why the lifespan of any task force should be
shorter than the term of any councillor. It is impossible to ensure that
everyone will be on the same page after five years of dilly-dallying at
the task force level :)
-r
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|