ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Regarding data collected and the purpose of collecting data

  • To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [council] Regarding data collected and the purpose of collecting data
  • From: "Sophia B" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:25:49 +0200
  • Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qT7x7MVsijBgDixFnxzoUkG8cgSzYVaP4s6CiJduz53WFOoIPTTNTtn75QBHU6ztdfE6jn2AklhZD2puss8UmqXVhVObyRhN4JnLNWaPEEaVdEzRSamHPqQgCIeKW/Y43AcByHDt/S9uVMzbKCfsdVDfRZ7quYRcZarU0Tnmuyw=
  • In-reply-to: <443C49A6.9010600@tucows.com>
  • References: <20060411233115.32637.qmail@web54703.mail.yahoo.com> <024301c65dc2$21723810$7801a8c0@harris2> <443C49A6.9010600@tucows.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
=))
s


On 12/04/06, Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Anthony Harris wrote:
>
> > 4) Your repeated references to the problem of access
> >     to data have been exhaustively discussed within the
> >     Whois task force, actually since mid 2001.... Tiered
> >     access for entitled parties is of course a natural solution.
> >     (And we did think of it quite a while back!)
>
> Which is one very good reason why the lifespan of any task force should
> be shorter than the term of any councillor. It is impossible to ensure
> that everyone will be on the same page after five years of
> dilly-dallying at the task force level :)
>
> -r
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>