[council] RE: GNSO: PDP management issues [note changed thread]

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have said enough on this. But apparently NOT, since it seems to keep being
unclear. 

Proposed and draft proposals on work programmes on the existing PDPs, such
as time lines, etc. from staff are needed so that Council /or its Task
Forces can assess, review, edit and agree to such proposed work programs. 

And of course, then Council, or its TFs will advance policy work, supported
by ICANN policy staff, input from operational staff, and advised by the
legal ICANN team. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Liz Williams [mailto:liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 1:21 PM
To: Marilyn Cade
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: GNSO: PDP management issues [note changed thread]

Marilyn

Thanks for your note.

It is not my understanding that we are to devote any resources and  
time at all to the Feb 06 PCC:  Existing TLDs PDP as part of the two  
day working session in Wellington.  I have another email to the  
Council in preparation about the PCC-eTLD PDP which I was going to  
distribute tomorrow but I will send that out later tonight.

 From my side, it is entirely premature to be discussing the PCC-eTLD  
in Wellington.   Advice from the GNSO Secretariat today indicates  
that the public comment period will be between 7 March - 27 March.   
On current estimations, 10 April is the deadline for constituency  
statements.   I would encourage the Council to focus entirely on the  
new TLD PDP in the working sessions at the Wellington meetings.   
There is much good work to be done there and, in the background, I  
would hope that the constituencies would be preparing their  
statements which will then be folded into the PCC-eTLD Initial Report.

Kind regards.

Liz
....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




On 08 Mar 2006, at 18:15, Marilyn Cade wrote:

> Just one additional thought, since we have an "agreed" format with
> numbering, etc, for ease of reference in discussion, would be  
> important to
> keep that also in mind as the further documents are developed.
>
> Thanks, Liz, for the information about when we can expect the further
> Initial Report--e.g., end of this week. Important to have it as  
> soon as you
> can, given the work that we are all trying to review before flying to
> Wellington. :-)
>
> Just one thought, though. The intent of the working session is to  
> split the
> time over the two PDPs, as well as the meeting with the GAC working  
> group on
> gNSO. That may have been inherent in your email but it sounded a  
> bit like
> there was thought that the entire agenda is given over to this  
> particular
> pdp, and I don't believe that can be the case.
>
> But of course, we are still developing the exact schedule of work for
> Wellington. I would propose that we devote Saturday a.m. to this  
> work, and
> Saturday p.m. to the contractual terms PDP [sometimes called PDP  
> Feb-06].
> That will allow us to be prepared for our discussion Sunday a.m.  
> with the
> GAC working group, and then we can return to work on the  
> contractual terms
> PDP on Sunday p.m,
>
> Best regards and thanks for the update.
>
> Marilyn Cade
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner- 
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Ross Rader
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:09 AM
> To: Liz Williams
> Cc: GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO PDP new TLDS: Call for further information
>
> In documents like this, it would be useful to augment citations with a
> hyperlink to the referenced message or resource. It is difficult (or
> impossible) for a layperson to read this document and benefit from the
> larger context that these limited footnotes provide for.
>
> There are any number of online style guides that provide  
> recommendations
> for citing online sources ) - I heartily recommend that staff  
> choose one
> of these for future use - it will make these documents eminently more
> readable, and therefore useful, for our purposes.
>
> i.e. http://www.lib.duke.edu/libguide/cite/Turabian.htm
>
> [25] National Park Service,  Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National
> Historic Site, 11 February 2003, available from
> http://www.nps.gov/abli/; Internet; accessed 13 February 2003.
>
> Liz Williams wrote:
>> Dear Colleagues
>>
>> I have attached for your review a document which sets out a  
>> request for
>> additional information on the technical selection criteria for new  
>> TLDs.
>>
>> The document focuses on four key questions around technical  
>> criteria which
> we
>> discussed at some length at the Washington meeting.
>>
>> Could I ask you and your constituencies to come to Wellington with  
>> more
> detailed
>> information about your positions (and the justification for those
> positions
>> based on ICANN's mission and values)?  We would then be able to move
> forward
>> with discussions about the appropriateness of other selection  
>> criteria and
>
>> allocation methods.
>>
>> I will be delivering to you all, I hope by the end of this week, an
> updated
>> version of the new TLD /Initial Report/ in which I have included
> Washington
>> inputs and other information.
>>
>> I would expect to be working on that /Initial Report/ during the  
>> two day
> session
>> planned for 25 & 26 March.
>>
>> Kind regards and, of course, any questions come straight back to  
>> me.  If
>> necessary, we could add quick discussion of this document to the  
>> agenda
> for next
>> week's Council call.
>>
>> Liz
>> .....................................................
>>
>> Liz Williams
>> Senior Policy Counselor
>> ICANN - Brussels
>> +32 2 234 7874 tel
>> +32 2 234 7848 fax
>> +32 497 07 4243 mob
>>
>> =
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>>
>>
>> =