RE: [council] GNSO: PDP management issues [note changed thread]

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No - lets stick with PDP-Feb06.

The less new terms we add the better.

The terms of reference really define the PDP.
- e.g policy regarding renewal etc.

PDP-Dec05 and PDP-Feb06 are intimately linked and we should focus on the
terms of reference themselves.

Regards,
Bruce
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 March 2006 1:31 PM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO: PDP management issues [note 
> changed thread]
> 
> Policy for Contractual Conditions:  Existing TLDs.
> 
> PCC:  eTLD
> .....................................................
> 
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 08 Mar 2006, at 19:28, Ross Rader wrote:
> 
> > Liz - Can you decode? What is PCC and PCC-eTLD?
> >
> > Liz Williams wrote:
> >> Marilyn
> >> Thanks for your note.
> >> It is not my understanding that we are to devote any resources and 
> >> time at all to the Feb 06 PCC:  Existing TLDs PDP as part 
> of the two 
> >> day working session in Wellington.  I have another email to the 
> >> Council in preparation about the PCC-eTLD PDP which I was going to 
> >> distribute tomorrow but I will send that out later tonight.
> >>  From my side, it is entirely premature to be discussing the PCC- 
> >> eTLD in Wellington.   Advice from the GNSO Secretariat today  
> >> indicates that the public comment period will be between 7 March -
> >> 27 March.  On current estimations, 10 April is the deadline for  
> >> constituency statements.   I would encourage the Council to focus  
> >> entirely on the new TLD PDP in the working sessions at the 
> Wellington 
> >> meetings.  There is much good work to be done there and, in the 
> >> background, I would hope that the constituencies would be 
> preparing 
> >> their statements which will then be folded into the 
> PCC-eTLD Initial 
> >> Report.
> >> Kind regards.
> >> Liz
> >> .....................................................
> >> Liz Williams
> >> Senior Policy Counselor
> >> ICANN - Brussels
> >> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> >> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> >> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> >> On 08 Mar 2006, at 18:15, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> >>> Just one additional thought, since we have an "agreed" 
> format with 
> >>> numbering, etc, for ease of reference in discussion, would be 
> >>> important to keep that also in mind as the further documents are 
> >>> developed.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, Liz, for the information about when we can expect the 
> >>> further Initial Report--e.g., end of this week. Important 
> to have it 
> >>> as soon as you can, given the work that we are all trying 
> to review 
> >>> before flying to Wellington. :-)
> >>>
> >>> Just one thought, though. The intent of the working session is to 
> >>> split the time over the two PDPs, as well as the meeting with the 
> >>> GAC working group on gNSO. That may have been inherent in 
> your email 
> >>> but it sounded a bit like there was thought that the 
> entire agenda 
> >>> is given over to this particular pdp, and I don't believe 
> that can 
> >>> be the case.
> >>>
> >>> But of course, we are still developing the exact schedule of work 
> >>> for Wellington. I would propose that we devote Saturday 
> a.m. to this 
> >>> work, and Saturday p.m. to the contractual terms PDP [sometimes 
> >>> called PDP Feb-06].
> >>> That will allow us to be prepared for our discussion Sunday a.m.  
> >>> with the
> >>> GAC working group, and then we can return to work on the 
> contractual 
> >>> terms PDP on Sunday p.m,
> >>>
> >>> Best regards and thanks for the update.
> >>>
> >>> Marilyn Cade
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner- 
> >>> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:09 AM
> >>> To: Liz Williams
> >>> Cc: GNSO Council
> >>> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO PDP new TLDS: Call for further 
> >>> information
> >>>
> >>> In documents like this, it would be useful to augment 
> citations with 
> >>> a hyperlink to the referenced message or resource. It is 
> difficult 
> >>> (or
> >>> impossible) for a layperson to read this document and 
> benefit from 
> >>> the larger context that these limited footnotes provide for.
> >>>
> >>> There are any number of online style guides that provide 
> >>> recommendations for citing online sources ) - I heartily 
> recommend 
> >>> that staff choose one of these for future use - it will 
> make these 
> >>> documents eminently more readable, and therefore useful, for our 
> >>> purposes.
> >>>
> >>> i.e. http://www.lib.duke.edu/libguide/cite/Turabian.htm
> >>>
> >>> [25] National Park Service,  Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National 
> >>> Historic Site, 11 February 2003, available from 
> >>> http://www.nps.gov/abli/; Internet; accessed 13 February 2003.
> >>>
> >>> Liz Williams wrote:
> >>>> Dear Colleagues
> >>>>
> >>>> I have attached for your review a document which sets 
> out a request 
> >>>> for additional information on the technical selection 
> criteria for 
> >>>> new TLDs.
> >>>>
> >>>> The document focuses on four key questions around technical 
> >>>> criteria which
> >>> we
> >>>> discussed at some length at the Washington meeting.
> >>>>
> >>>> Could I ask you and your constituencies to come to 
> Wellington with 
> >>>> more
> >>> detailed
> >>>> information about your positions (and the justification for those
> >>> positions
> >>>> based on ICANN's mission and values)?  We would then be able to 
> >>>> move
> >>> forward
> >>>> with discussions about the appropriateness of other selection 
> >>>> criteria and
> >>>
> >>>> allocation methods.
> >>>>
> >>>> I will be delivering to you all, I hope by the end of 
> this week, an
> >>> updated
> >>>> version of the new TLD /Initial Report/ in which I have included
> >>> Washington
> >>>> inputs and other information.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would expect to be working on that /Initial Report/ during the 
> >>>> two day
> >>> session
> >>>> planned for 25 & 26 March.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kind regards and, of course, any questions come straight back to 
> >>>> me.  If necessary, we could add quick discussion of this 
> document 
> >>>> to the agenda
> >>> for next
> >>>> week's Council call.
> >>>>
> >>>> Liz
> >>>> .....................................................
> >>>>
> >>>> Liz Williams
> >>>> Senior Policy Counselor
> >>>> ICANN - Brussels
> >>>> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> >>>> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> >>>> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> >>>>
> >>>> =
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -----
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> =
> 
>