<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: EU commision examines .com contract
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: EU commision examines .com contract
- From: Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 04:09:52 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HEfk4BjWMJLJCe+AmTF/3uUTCxUMDJTdInLD8cQ1B8rEMziT79fpTV5SQksN0sYns1eDOykDwr7pHkzHczTaAMUbJGGKXqKkaSJX2sGk4hE6TiEFu6qRHc26LyBR5i8GxWjCRfFoPN5gdcUK/aYaHXQSxEh54HT2FmlnruOTlsI= ;
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FYI
--- Iliya Nickelt <iliya@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:31:05 +0100
> From: Iliya Nickelt <iliya@xxxxxx>
> Subject: EU commision examines .com contract
> To: NCUC-DISCUSS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> FYI: A speaker from the competition directorate of the EU
> commission
> (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition) has confirmed that they are
>
> examining the ICANN verisign .com contract, apparently stimulated
> by
> CFIT. I don't think it has been widely noticed yet, as this
> interesting
> bit of info was researched by Monika Ermert from heise and the
> article is
> published in German.
> (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/70352). I
> did not find any comment at the eu site. Investigation does not
> mean that
> they will take any steps, of course, but still interesting.
>
> --iliya
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|