Re: [council] FW: Registry Constituency statement concerning the PDP Feb 06
With respect to my colleagues in the registry constituency, I find it extremely bad form to have lengthy documents such as this tabled minutes before a long-scheduled call. I would like to request that any consideration or discussion of this submission be set aside pending an opportunity for the rest of council to adequately review them with our respective constituencies. This should be done in parallel with our existing agenda - I don't seek to delay consideration of any documents or items on the agenda that has been distributed. Thanks, -r Bruce Tonkin wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Marie.Zitkova Sent: Thursday, 2 March 2006 2:40 AM To: Bruce Tonkin Subject: Registry Constituency statement concerning the PDP Feb 06 Dear Bruce, Please find enclosed gTLD Registry Constituency statement concerning the PDP Feb 06 now under discussion in the Council. The statement and its preface were discussed during the past two weeks on the mailing list and during regular calls of the constituency. Our position was adopted during our call yesterday, Verisign abstained. Best regards, Marie (See attached file: Preface to RyC Comments on PDP Feb-06.doc)(See attached file: RyC Comments on PDP Feb-06.DOC) Marie Zitkova Chair, gTLD Registries Construency
|