<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Advice from the General Counsels office on the use of proxy votes
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- To: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Advice from the General Counsels office on the use of proxy votes
- From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:14:17 +0000 GMT
- Importance: Normal
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
I was recalling these discussions from earlier. Seems strange that this isn't
documented.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:15:02
To:<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Advice from the General Counsels office on the use of
proxy votes
I have this edit from my personal records:
Rules of Procedure for the DNSO version 7
Adopted by the Names Council 26 February 2001.
Amended (new item 8) 26 February 2001.
Amended (new item 3 and re-numbering) 11 July 2001.
Amended (new item 9, 10, 11) 13 December 2001
Amended (new item 12) 10 April 2001 (added Jan 2002)
Amended (new item 13) 18 April 2002
Contents
1. NC Chair
2. Conduct of NC meetings
3. NC committees and task forces
4. Intake committee
5. Proxies
..
Section 5 describes proxies in the way we have been using them.
Philip
Regards,
Marilyn Cade
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|