RE: [council] PDP on new gTLDs - draft Initial Report

["Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ross,
One way of sorting it out would be that you post a clarifying public comment
to that effect. By the way, I don't think it can be inferred from the report
that your constituency has established a consensus position - we do refer to
a "subset of the Registrar Constituency" and "some Registrars".

Another way could be that you post a full constituency statement as a public
comment, to supersede the previous comments.
Regards
Olof


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ross Rader
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 5:05 PM
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] PDP on new gTLDs - draft Initial Report

an "unclarified" version of this document has been since posted for 
public comment. When will these clarifications be made? I am 
uncomfortable with the notion that the ICANN community will be 
commenting on the version that implies that the Registrar Constituency 
has established a consensus position.

Thanks in advance,

-ross

olof nordling wrote:
> Ross,
> It is an evolving draft, as said, so no problem with making
clarifications.
> It would be even more useful to have a constituency statement with the
> consolidated views of the Registrars, if efforts could be made to gauge
> support in the constituency for individual views expressed.
> Regards
> Olof
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Ross Rader
> Sent: den 15 februari 2006 21:17
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] PDP on new gTLDs - draft Initial Report
> 
> Olof -
> 
> Thank you for preparing this document.
> 
> I believe a small clarification is required. The document characterizes 
> specific inputs from the Registrar submission as being a collective 
> submission of a subset of registrars. In truth, each point made in the 
> registrar document is simply the input of a specific registrar and no 
> effort was made to gauge support for or against any of these statements. 
> It would be helpful if the document could be amended to reflect the fact 
> that these statements belong to individual registrars and are not a 
> collective statement in any way.
> 
> Much thanks again,
> 
> -ross
> 
> Olof Nordling wrote:
>> Dear Council Members,
>>
>> Please find a draft Initial Report attached for our work on the New gTLD
>> PDP. As agreed, it is intended to be an evolving draft, to be
successively
>> updated as work progresses within the GNSO as well as in interaction with
>> other SOs and ACs and the wider community.
>>
>> Very best regards
>>
>> Olof
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> Olof Nordling 
>> Manager, Policy Development Coordination 
>> ICANN 
>> 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 
>> B-1040 Brussels, Belgium 
>> Tel.: +32.2.234 7872
>>
>> Mobile: +32.475.420805 
>> Fax: +32.2.234 7848
>>
>> E-mail: olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx 
>>  <http://www.icann.org> www.icann.org
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>