<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Regarding meeting in Washington, DC - Friday 24 Feb and Saturday 25 Feb
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Regarding meeting in Washington, DC - Friday 24 Feb and Saturday 25 Feb
- From: Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 04:42:42 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4DNH7BTAAhcR4J9sIIpXeobILbTreAhYoZ6T/6Mw1H0kEfnGuUn2rv1iT/rtRKCshwkX4V/cvp7podxtKrP5DeK1vch2r/eDuztqHs4QSBTOiVotTKwcJhX+zMWOy4szZlznehpOAreR+zq5ASdWB22Ieo4yioehcVRs3MlaQ4o= ;
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540262E96E@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> As agreed during our teleconference on 6 Feb 2006, the meeting in
> Washington will be for the Committee working on the new gTLD policy
> development process. The Committee is of the whole Council, but
> where a
> Council member cannot attend, they may nominate another person from
> their constituency to participate. The constituency/Council
> member
> should inform the GNSO Secretariat of such a nomination prior to
> the
> meeting.
>
I have also understood that each constituency could send up to 3
delegates to the meeting - is that correct? is this also a feature of
the "Committee of the whole Council", or was it part of the earlier
D.C meeting package :) or formula?
Mawaki
>
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|