ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Regarding meeting in Washington, DC - Friday 24 Feb and Saturday 25 Feb

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Regarding meeting in Washington, DC - Friday 24 Feb and Saturday 25 Feb
  • From: Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 04:42:42 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4DNH7BTAAhcR4J9sIIpXeobILbTreAhYoZ6T/6Mw1H0kEfnGuUn2rv1iT/rtRKCshwkX4V/cvp7podxtKrP5DeK1vch2r/eDuztqHs4QSBTOiVotTKwcJhX+zMWOy4szZlznehpOAreR+zq5ASdWB22Ieo4yioehcVRs3MlaQ4o= ;
  • In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540262E96E@balius.mit>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello,

--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello All,
> 
> As agreed during our teleconference on 6 Feb 2006, the meeting in
> Washington will be for the Committee working on the new gTLD policy
> development process.  The Committee is of the whole Council, but
> where a
> Council member cannot attend, they may nominate another person from
> their constituency to participate.   The constituency/Council
> member
> should inform the GNSO Secretariat of such a nomination prior to
> the
> meeting.
> 

I have also understood that each constituency could send up to 3
delegates to the meeting - is that correct? is this also a feature of
the "Committee of the whole Council", or was it part of the earlier
D.C meeting package :) or formula?

Mawaki 

> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>