RE: [council] Commencement of the new PDP

["Kiyoshi I. Tsuru" <ktsuru@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agree.

Kiyoshi I. Tsuru
Bello, Gallardo, Morales y Tsuru, S.C.
Agustín Manuel Chávez 1 - 001
Centro de Ciudad Santa Fe
01210, México, D.F.
Tel. +52 (55) 5292-5232
Fax +52 (55) 5292-5233
www.bgmt.com.mx

La información contenida en este mensaje de datos es confidencial,
constituye un secreto industrial en términos de la legislación vigente y se
encuentra dirigida exclusivamente al destinatario indicado en dicho mensaje.
Si usted recibe esta información por error o si usted no es el destinatario
del mensaje, favor de destruirlo inmediatamente, absteniéndose de leerlo,
reproducirlo, transmitirlo, almacenarlo, divulgarlo, revelarlo o usarlo de
manera directa o indirecta en cualquier forma y por cualquier medio. Muchas
gracias.
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential,
privileged and intended for its recipient only. If you receive this mail by
mistake and/or if you are not the recipient thereof, please destroy it
immediately, abstaining yourself from reading, reproducing, transmitting,
storing, disclosing, revealing or using it, either directly or indirectly,
in any manner and by any means. Thank you very much.

 


-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Bret Fausett
Enviado el: Miércoles, 08 de Febrero de 2006 11:42 a.m.
Para: GNSO Council
Asunto: Re: [council] Commencement of the new PDP

Ross Rader wrote:

> I'd also like understand better what specifically the expert 3rd 
> parties would be retained to do. My initial instinct is that it is 
> premature to discuss the retention of experts before we understand the 
> questions and answers we are looking for.

I typically think of "expert" work as something on which specialized 
knowledge, outside the common understanding of members of the counsel, 
is required. On the .COM Agreement, when we're talking about what 
contractual issues are properly GNSO policy issues, that strikes me as 
exactly the sort of thing the Council can and should do on its own. To 
the extent that we need expertise in registry services technical issues 
and do not believe that we would get neutral, unbiased input from the 
registries constituency (no offense intended, folks, just a possibility 
whenever we have one constituency that is particularly affected by a 
PDP), that might be another place where expertise would be helpful.

           Bret