ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FW: Vote on the GNSO call

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FW: Vote on the GNSO call
  • From: "Seo, June" <jseo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:13:51 -0500
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcYr1x258iRnaBOPSGuxw0G26ZbUFQAHxMXwAArfu2A=
  • Thread-topic: Vote on the GNSO call

Dear Councilors,

FYI - I would like to clarify my intentions around my proxy statement during 
the initial voting procedure in Yesterday's call. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Seo, June 
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 10:03 AM
To: 'GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: Vote on the GNSO call

Dear Glen,

Thank you very much for your note. I hereby verify that I voted "No" on the 
motion below. 

Just to clarify my intentions for the proxy statement I made during the initial 
voting procedure, I think I should have made statements in advance on why I 
wanted to do it earlier than my proxy statement. As I mentioned during the 
call, I am in the Council to represent my constituency's position, not my 
personal one. The Articles of Operations of the gTLD Constituency also require 
me to represent the views of the Constituency. I do not believe there are any 
conflicts of interests for me to vote in this motion, but I wanted to avoid any 
probable misperceptions of conflicts of interests by giving my proxy to Ken. 

For the Washington meetings, I will not be able to attend due to other prior 

Thanks and Regards,
June Seo

-----Original Message-----
From: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 6:10 AM
To: Seo, June
Subject: Vote on the GNSO call

Dear June,

It was great that you were on the call last night and I hope that you are well 
recovered from your surgical intervention.
Thank you for your Interest Statement.

I would just like to check with you what your vote was on the GNSO council call 
on February 6, 2006.

I have noted the following, but please correct me and add what comments you 
would like:

"Council resolves to initiate a Policy Development Process in line with it's 17 
January 2006 request for an issues report the intent of which was to address 
the broader policy issues raised."

Vote: 19 votes in favour, Marilyn Cade, Philip Sheppard, Grant Forsyth,
(CBUC) Ute Decker, Kiyoshi Tsuru, (IPC) Tony Holmes, Tony Harris, Greg Ruth, 
(ISPCPC) Robin Gross (NCUC),  Bruce Tonkin (2), Ross Rader (2), Tom Keller 
(2)(Registrars constituency), Maureen Cubberley, Sophia Bekele, Avri Doria 
(Nominating committee appointees), (18 votes) Kiyoshi Tsuru voted a proxy in 
favour for Lucy Nichols  (IPC) who was absent.

6 votes against, Cary Karp (2), Ken Stubbs (2), June Seo (2)(gTLD registries 

1 abstention Mawaki Chango (NCUC)
1 person was not on the call and  did not provide a proxy, Norbert Klein (NCUC)"

Would you please also let me know whether you will attending the Washington 
meetings on the 24 and 25 February 2006.

Thank you so very much
Kind regards,


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>