<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Oops: Regarding issues report on IDNs
- To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Oops: Regarding issues report on IDNs
- From: Cary Karp <ck@nic.museum>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 18:34:32 +0100
- Cc: John Klensin <klensin@xxxxxxx>, Patrik Fältstrom <paf@xxxxxxxxx>, Tina Dam <dam@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <43E4E3AD.8050504@nic.museum>
- References: <355313303-1139066387-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-8820-@engine88> <43E4E3AD.8050504@nic.museum>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
> If the only means that were permitted for the registration of an IDN
> TLD were the assignment of a CNAME record to a pre-existing name tree,
That should be DNAME, not CNAME (a well understood beast which we all
safely rely on).
Sorry!
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|