<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Ad promotion of Call for Papers on new gTLDs
- To: "'Cary Karp'" <ck@nic.museum>, "'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Ad promotion of Call for Papers on new gTLDs
- From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:10:10 -0500
- Cc: "'Olof Nordling'" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601102037560.24633@nic.museum>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcYWHo72djtM4HIxR+SypLW3re/CjQAE/6Sw
The call can be modified to say that all contributions will be posted to the
public forum as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cary Karp [mailto:ck@nic.museum]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:44 PM
To: 'GNSO Council'
Cc: Marilyn Cade; 'Olof Nordling'
Subject: RE: [council] Ad promotion of Call for Papers on new gTLDs
> I don't think we ever agreed that someone would read a paper,
> similar to an academic conference. We were clear that we would
> provide opportunities for summary presentations/discussions of
> contributions on some basis.
The call as posted on the ICANN site says:
"Received papers will be considered for oral presentations to the
GNSO Council during February 2006, via scheduled conference calls
with the GNSO Council."
If the oral presentations are only to be summary descriptions of the
papers and nothing is said about any other mode of publication, why
would anyone undertake the time and effort of preparing a
"substantive paper"?
Any chance of the Council seeing the ad copy before we commit to it?
/Cary
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|