<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] PDP timelines
- To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] PDP timelines
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:49:24 +1100
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcYRruRl/bhwn/7bQNW2Vtn94Xqv7wABFe8w
- Thread-topic: [council] PDP timelines
Hello Avri,
> >
>
> I think in most cases, in my experience at least, projects that do
> not complete on time are reviewed and extended only if warranted.
Agreed.
> Automatic sunset that disregards complexity or issues does
> not seem the best alternative to me. It seems that any
> notion of concluding a PDP must require a definitive action,
> e.g. a vote, as opposed to some automatic mechanism.
>
I would have thought that should be the other way around. Any extension
of a deadline/project requires a definitive vote.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|