<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Extension of public comment period - the "quickie" notice
Hi,
While I am still less then comfortable with requiring the papers at
the same time as comments, i.e. not requiring them at least a week in
advance so that the on line consultations could take place before the
end of the comment period, i think the wording is fine.
a.
On 21 dec 2005, at 21.40, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Hello Olof,
I suggest replace the last sentence with:
"In addition, a call for papers, for posting and consideration for
oral
presentations to the GNSO, will be issued shortly with the same
deadline
of 31 January 2006"
We can then refine the words around how papers would be considered
(e.g
that they are within the scope of the PDP etc).
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|