ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Draft resolution Verisign for Council 2 Dec

  • To: <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Draft resolution Verisign for Council 2 Dec
  • From: <Niklas_Lagergren@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 02:16:00 +0100
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcX2tuUIZ+lOe7q2SY+7pkNovykgtQAJftcg
  • Thread-topic: [council] Draft resolution Verisign for Council 2 Dec

While the IPC agrees with the points raised in the preamble, we think the 
timeline set in the resolution is a bit unrealistic.  The Board needs to act in 
the best interest of the corporation.  They have a fiduciary duty to do so.  
Delaying action until March may be too long and not in the best interest of 
getting the lawsuits settled. We are also not convinced by the merits of a PDP 
on the issues mentioned in paragraph 2 but will not oppose the suggested 
wording if all other constituencies wish to keep it.

Our proposed amendments are reproduced in attachment.

Niklas


-----Original Message-----
From: Marilyn Cade [mailto:marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: jeudi 1 décembre 2005 21:34
To: Philip Sheppard; owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Draft resolution Verisign for Council 2 Dec

Proposed amendment to BC resolution. 

I have heard from one or two of you that you would prefer to separate the 
resolution into two segments. I believe this is easy to do, and can support 
that. . I urge all constituencies to discuss this resolution. It is the BC 
intent to call for a supporting vote for the resolution, with the idea of 
separating the call for the PDP/issues report from the board resolution. 
-----Original Message-----
From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:54:57 
To:council@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Draft resolution Verisign for Council 2 Dec

Council members,
please find attached from the Bc a  proposed draft Council motion on the
Verisign settlement. This follows the constituency presentations at the
Verisign review meeting and proposes the board delay adoption until the
council has considered the GNSO related aspects arising from the
settlement.

We hope this provides a full day for Constituencies to consider the
proposed motion before Council might adopt it.

Philip

Regards,
Marilyn Cade




Attachment: GNSO Council Verisign settlement_IPCcomments_01122005.doc
Description: GNSO Council Verisign settlement_IPCcomments_01122005.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>