ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Letter from WIPO to ICANN

  • To: <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Letter from WIPO to ICANN
  • From: <Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:28:30 -0600
  • Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcXt9ikWMLH5HVdfTk6gVSJ0BCZQxwAACKWg
  • Thread-topic: [council] Letter from WIPO to ICANN

Notwithstanding the recent events in Tunisia,  I am quite surprised at
the tone of the letter as it is terribly over-confident.  As Bruce
pointed out, there is a major flaw in their interpretation of the ICANN
process and I think that needs to be immediately clarified. 
 
Lucy

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Bret Fausett
>Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 7:15 PM
>To: Bruce Tonkin
>Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [council] Letter from WIPO to ICANN
>
> > I note below that there is a fundamental flaw in the 
>understanding  > of the process.
>
>I suspect that WIPO knows well the requirements of the ICANN 
>process but is using the new pressure from governments in WSIS 
>to push forward an unpopular agenda item.
>
>         Bret
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>