ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Election of GNSO Council chair

  • To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Election of GNSO Council chair
  • From: "Liz Williams" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:55 +0200
  • Cc: "'Alejandro Pisanty'" <apisan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <200510141255.j9ECtYvn031498@turbo.aim.be>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcXQunCCc4xOAA6NTNaL6S0NtDSFsQABJ4+gAAAynvA=

Hi Philip

Yes, will include this.  I think it's a good set of questions to ask.  

I do, however, take Marilyn's point that this needs to be fixed in the
interim so that we can keep Bruce in the traces for as long as possible!

Liz

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 3:03 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Alejandro Pisanty'
Subject: RE: [council] Election of GNSO Council chair


Ross, 
this sounds plausible as a rationale.
But does it reflect reality ?

Liz, 
maybe a good question for the review?
ie Is there any evidence (within the GNSo's history)  to suggest that more
GNSO business items are concluded at a physical meeting, as opposed to a
telephone meeting?
In particular, were more items concluded at the annual meting than at other
physical meetings?

Philip




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>