<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Election of GNSO Council chair
- To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Election of GNSO Council chair
- From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:07:58 -0400
- Cc: "'Alejandro Pisanty'" <apisan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <200510140733.j9E7XaCU027770@turbo.aim.be>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcXQBfY1KgysQ7Y0Qx6pGKYY9Z7ocAAi6m/wAAdwW2A=
And the history probably doesn't matter anyway. :-) So, as the staff are
identifying things to change in the "review", this would have made the list
anyway, probably.
But we should just change it. Efficiently, and orderly. And now.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 3:41 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Alejandro Pisanty'
Subject: [council] Election of GNSO Council chair
This discussion has exposed an issue in the current bylaws in that the terms
of office of the Board and Council (and by implication Council chair) are
tied not to long standing calendar events such as the 1st January, but to a
movable feast called the ICANN annual meeting. The timing of the annual
meeting is subject to the whims of geography, hoteliers and local
organisers.
So, what exactly is the ADVANTAGE of this arrangement?
Mike? Marilyn ? Ross ? Bruce? Alejandro ? do you remember? Dammed if I do.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|