ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] ICANN Strategic Planning Process

  • To: Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Strategic Planning Process
  • From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:45:03 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB5401D91BF9@balius.mit>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P>Dear Bruce, </P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Thanks for forwarding this to the Council. I note that Paul Twomey is suggesting 
what appears to be a session limited to the chairs of the SO, or their representative. In 
the Council case, we have used a small group of volunteers who have reviewed the Stratplan 
and participated throughout the process, being very inclusive of the full So in all the 
events, etc. I am not sure that it is feasible, or adviseable to resolve this into such a 
small group as Paul suggests. perhaps we can discuss further how best to ensure broad 
support to the Stratplan. </P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>marilyn<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #a0c6e5 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 
0px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; FONT-FAMILY: tahoma,sans-serif">
<HR color=#a0c6e5 SIZE=1>

<DIV></DIV>From:&nbsp;&nbsp;<I>"Bruce Tonkin" &lt;Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;</I><BR>To:&nbsp;&nbsp;<I>"GNSO Council" &lt;council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;</I><BR>Subject:&nbsp;&nbsp;<I>[council] ICANN Strategic Planning Process</I><BR>Date:&nbsp;&nbsp;<I>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:10:58 +1000</I><BR>&gt;Hello All,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;See note from Paul Twomey below.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;I proposed we schedule a GNSO Council meeting for Thursday 6 October<BR>&gt;2005 to discuss the issues paper which will be available next week.&nbsp;&nbsp; We<BR>&gt;can then respond back to Paul by 15 October 2005.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Regards,<BR>&gt;Bruce Tonkin<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;-----Original Message-----<BR>&gt;From: Paul Twomey [mailto:twomey@xxxxxxxxx]<BR>&gt;Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2005 4:58 PM<BR>&gt;To: Bruce Tonkin<BR>&gt;Subject: ICANN Strategic Planning Process<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Dear Bruce<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;We are now in the middle of the ICANN strategic planning process for the<BR>&gt;2006-2009 plan.&nbsp;&nbsp;In Luxembourg, the process was outlined, and a copy of<BR>&gt;that outline is attached.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;At present we are waiting for the response from the final SO/AC and hope<BR>&gt;to have the issues paper available next week.&nbsp;&nbsp;This puts us a little<BR>&gt;behind schedule, but not hopelessly so.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;The next step is to have the SOs, ACs and other members of the community<BR>&gt;respond to the issues paper.&nbsp;&nbsp;We will be asking for two elements in<BR>&gt;those responses.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;The first element will be an indication of whether the issues that have<BR>&gt;been identified in the issues paper are the correct issues.&nbsp;&nbsp;The issues<BR>&gt;paper is based on the input that was received from the consultation<BR>&gt;process.&nbsp;&nbsp;There will undoubtedly be places where the perspectives of<BR>&gt;members of the GNSO differ from some of the views of other members of<BR>&gt;the community.&nbsp;&nbsp;What we are looking for is a validation that the major<BR>&gt;issues have been covered and that the views of the GNSO are represented,<BR>&gt;not that you agree with everything that everybody said.<BR>&gt;Based on those issues, we would like the GNSO to identify what it<BR>&gt;believes the strategic priorities for ICANN should be, and, if possible,<BR>&gt;how ICANN should go about addressing those priorities. If the priorities<BR>&gt;really are to be priorities, there should be no more than five of them.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Although it is a tight deadline, we would like to have those responses<BR>&gt;by 15 October.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;As mentioned in Luxembourg, we would then like to convene a meeting of<BR>&gt;the Chairs of the SOs and ACs (or their representatives) to agree on a<BR>&gt;common set of priorities.&nbsp;&nbsp;The arrangements for this meeting are still<BR>&gt;being finalised and we will let you know the details as soon as<BR>&gt;possible.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Once these key strategic priorities have been formulated, they will be<BR>&gt;circulated for comment.&nbsp;&nbsp;Based on the feedback received, a draft<BR>&gt;strategic plan will be prepared for distribution in November.&nbsp;&nbsp;Further<BR>&gt;consultation will take place at the Vancouver meeting, with a view to<BR>&gt;having the Board approve a final version of the plan in January.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Thank you for your assistance in the planning process.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Regards,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Paul<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>
<P>&gt;&lt;&lt; ICANNstrategicplanningprocess2005.ppt &gt;&gt;
<DIV></DIV>
<P></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></div></html>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>