<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] ICANN Strategic Planning Process
- To: Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Strategic Planning Process
- From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:45:03 -0400
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB5401D91BF9@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P>Dear Bruce, </P>
<P> </P>
<P>Thanks for forwarding this to the Council. I note that Paul Twomey is suggesting
what appears to be a session limited to the chairs of the SO, or their representative. In
the Council case, we have used a small group of volunteers who have reviewed the Stratplan
and participated throughout the process, being very inclusive of the full So in all the
events, etc. I am not sure that it is feasible, or adviseable to resolve this into such a
small group as Paul suggests. perhaps we can discuss further how best to ensure broad
support to the Stratplan. </P>
<P> </P>
<P>marilyn<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #a0c6e5 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT:
0px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; FONT-FAMILY: tahoma,sans-serif">
<HR color=#a0c6e5 SIZE=1>
<DIV></DIV>From: <I>"Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></I><BR>To: <I>"GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></I><BR>Subject: <I>[council] ICANN Strategic Planning Process</I><BR>Date: <I>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:10:58 +1000</I><BR>>Hello All,<BR>><BR>>See note from Paul Twomey below.<BR>><BR>>I proposed we schedule a GNSO Council meeting for Thursday 6 October<BR>>2005 to discuss the issues paper which will be available next week. We<BR>>can then respond back to Paul by 15 October 2005.<BR>><BR>>Regards,<BR>>Bruce Tonkin<BR>><BR>><BR>>-----Original Message-----<BR>>From: Paul Twomey [mailto:twomey@xxxxxxxxx]<BR>>Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2005 4:58 PM<BR>>To: Bruce Tonkin<BR>>Subject: ICANN Strategic Planning Process<BR>><BR>>Dear Bruce<BR>><BR>>We
are now in the middle of the ICANN strategic planning process for the<BR>>2006-2009 plan. In Luxembourg, the process was outlined, and a copy of<BR>>that outline is attached.<BR>><BR>>At present we are waiting for the response from the final SO/AC and hope<BR>>to have the issues paper available next week. This puts us a little<BR>>behind schedule, but not hopelessly so.<BR>><BR>>The next step is to have the SOs, ACs and other members of the community<BR>>respond to the issues paper. We will be asking for two elements in<BR>>those responses.<BR>><BR>>The first element will be an indication of whether the issues that have<BR>>been identified in the issues paper are the correct issues. The issues<BR>>paper is based on the input that was received from the consultation<BR>>process. There will
undoubtedly be places where the perspectives of<BR>>members of the GNSO differ from some of the views of other members of<BR>>the community. What we are looking for is a validation that the major<BR>>issues have been covered and that the views of the GNSO are represented,<BR>>not that you agree with everything that everybody said.<BR>>Based on those issues, we would like the GNSO to identify what it<BR>>believes the strategic priorities for ICANN should be, and, if possible,<BR>>how ICANN should go about addressing those priorities. If the priorities<BR>>really are to be priorities, there should be no more than five of them.<BR>><BR>>Although it is a tight deadline, we would like to have those responses<BR>>by 15 October.<BR>><BR>>As mentioned in Luxembourg, we would then like to convene a meeting of<BR>>the Chairs of the SOs and ACs
(or their representatives) to agree on a<BR>>common set of priorities. The arrangements for this meeting are still<BR>>being finalised and we will let you know the details as soon as<BR>>possible.<BR>><BR>>Once these key strategic priorities have been formulated, they will be<BR>>circulated for comment. Based on the feedback received, a draft<BR>>strategic plan will be prepared for distribution in November. Further<BR>>consultation will take place at the Vancouver meeting, with a view to<BR>>having the Board approve a final version of the plan in January.<BR>><BR>>Thank you for your assistance in the planning process.<BR>><BR>>Regards,<BR>><BR>>Paul<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>
<P>><< ICANNstrategicplanningprocess2005.ppt >>
<DIV></DIV>
<P></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></div></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|