<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council teleconference on Thursday 22 September 2005
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council teleconference on Thursday 22 September 2005
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:22:12 +0200
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB5401CF282A@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcUNBanqk7bt/inNSkafVFVXStu9RwWyjekAAvIv28AFeWRmIALFi0MQA+CegWAAhdxeAAPd6VDgA3Z2OGADcFq4YARJ5FUwBt/cvBAAAcE7cA==
Bruce,
might I suggest a slight change to your proposals for agenda item 4 to
reflect past input from constituencies on these issues?
Item 4: Policy Development Process for new gtlds
- initiate vote for an issues report (as per annex A, Section 1 (b)) of
the bylaws)
- issues report to contain background material on:
* whether to continue to introduce new gTLDs
- collect previous submissions from constituencies on new gTLDs
* the criteria for approving applications for new gTLDs
- collect previous material used for .org and .net tenders and collect
previous submissions from constituencies on criteria for new gTLDs
* the allocation method, assuming that there was a limit to how many
gTLDs could be introduced at once
- collect previous input (e.g OECD etc) and collect previous submissions
from constituencies on allocation
* the key contractual conditions for those gTLDs which might include
conditions such as : escrow policies, obligation to use an ICANN accredited
registrar etc.
- collect current significant conditions from new gTLD agreements and
previous inputs from constituencies on contract conditions.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|