Re: [council] GNSO Review TOR + Background Information

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 31/08/2005 8:55 AM Liz Williams noted that;

> Could I ask you to review it - the Chair has asked for comments to be in by
> Friday 2 Sept Brussels COB.   He will then forward an updated document to
> the Board for 8 Sept once any additional comments are taken into account. 

I have several other less substantive comments, but this one is
significant enough to be submitted independently.

I have a substantial objection to section 3.2 and would like to see it
rephrased in substantially more positive and constructive terms.


Current:

3.2.    The GNSO Review is designed to determine:

o       whether that organization has a continuing purpose in the ICANN
structure,
o       and, if so, whether any change in structure or operations is desirable
to improve its effectiveness.

Proposed:

3.2     The GNSO Review is designed to analyse:

o       the current and continued role of the GNSO in the ICANN structure,
o       and recommend what changes in its structure or operations, or those of
ICANN itself, may be desirable to improve its effectiveness.


- --
Regards,



                       -rwr








                "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
                 every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
                 and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
                        - Robert Collier


Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFDFbLA6sL06XjirooRAjYWAJwLaKzJz6yVcHj2uI7Cfur+GKhcswCeN9cR
/NYr/gOAVYoF/3w+HSyI4Mo=
=5CMY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----