ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] On the use of 'fairness' et al

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] On the use of 'fairness' et al
  • From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:32:28 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <E962E009-9747-4023-A7C1-95233447CC04@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcWqJanYdkh0PijjT32SvKR8x6oyLgAAaL4Q
Avri,
everything you say is correct but we need to consider practicality.
 
The concern of myself and other Council members is to ensure the GNSO review
is done well but does not grow out of proportion to our prime objective of
policy development. The more comprehensive the review and the more
ill-defined its scope, the less resource (time and money) we have for this
objective.
 
I am concerned that we are today launching a GNSO review at a time when 17
out of 20 recommendations dating from last year for improving effectiveness
of the GNSO Council (and thus the GNSO) are NOT yet implemented due to lack
of resource.
 
If we end up in 2006 with a list of 20 new recommendations that are also not
implemented, the effectiveness of the GNSO will be unchanged.
 
 
Philip
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>