Re: [council] FW: the topic of new gTLDs and the role of gNSO Council
Avri,As background, in 1999-2000, the GNSO (then called the DNSO) created a working group to examine the new TLD issues. Recommendations from the working group were presented to the Council, and we voted in favor of the following resolution: The Names Council...recommends to the ICANN Board that it establish a policy for the introduction of new gTLDs in a measured and responsible manner, giving due regard in the implementation of that policy to (a) promoting orderly registration of names during the initial phases; (b) minimizing the use of gTLDs to carry out infringements of intellectual property rights; and (c) recognizing the need for ensuring user confidence in the technical operation of the new TLD and the DNS as a whole. Because there is no recent experience in introducing new gTLDs, we recommend to the Board that a limited number of new top-level domains be introduced initially and that the future introduction of additional top-level domains be done only after careful evaluation of the initial introduction. http://www.icann.org/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm#18/19April2000NCStatementThe ICANN Board adopted the Names Council's recommendations in the following resolution: Resolved [00.46] that the Board hereby adopts the Names Council's recommendation that a policy be established for the introduction of new TLDs in a measured and responsible manner. http://www.icann.org/minutes/minutes-16jul00.htmIn accord with the Names Council's recommendations in Paragraph 2 of the above statement of policy, ICANN approved the creation of seven new TLDs in November, 2000 (.INFO, .BIZ, .NAME, .PRO, .MUSEUM, .COOP, and .AERO). And, again as requested by the Names Council policy recommendation, ICANN commissioned a study of the initial introduction (http://icann.org/tlds/new-gtld-eval-31aug04.pdf). That pretty much brings us up to date. Bret Attachment:
smime.p7s
|