<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: [council] Registry Constituency IDN communiqué
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] RE: [council] Registry Constituency IDN communiqué
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:06:51 +1100
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcUaV7UrotEnOZuBRXm6YZ7qndvxswAbXhPg
- Thread-topic: [council] Registry Constituency IDN communiqué
Thanks Cary.
You might like to include some specific examples of two identifiers (names)
that could look the same, and explain how a registry would avoid the problem
for each example.
Regards,
Bruce
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cary Karp
> Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2005 9:00 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Registry Constituency IDN communiqué
>
> The communiqué that I mentioned at last week's Council
> meeting is now on-line at:
>
> http://www.icann.org/topics/news022305.html
>
> You may also wish to note the broader topic page that ICANN
> has posted at:
>
> http://www.icann.org/topics/idn.html
>
> /Cary
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|