RE: [council] WIPO-II
- To: "'Paul Verhoef'" <paul.verhoef@xxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] WIPO-II
- From: Alick Wilson <alick.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:48:00 +1300
- Cc: "'John Jeffrey'" <jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <200411230941.iAN9fTb27106@santee.icann.org>
- Reply-to: alick.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Colleagues, I wonder if there is a case to be made for new sTLDs for
international intergovernmental organizations (say .igo) and countries (say
While these would not deal directly with offending sites in the rest of the
gTLD namespace, it would at least provide a single official address for IGOs
The concept could, of course, be extended to other sensitive types of name.
Am I right off track or does this have some merit?
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Paul Verhoef
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2004 10:41 p.m.
Cc: 'John Jeffrey'
Subject: [council] WIPO-II
Please find enclosed the letter and its annex from WIPO that we received
I understand there were some technical issues with getting it on the
web-site but as soon as these are arranged it will go up, hopefully already
today. I would like to offer my excuses for that.
Vice President Policy Development Support
6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5
B-1040 Brussels, Belgium
Tel.: +32.2.234 7872
Fax: +32.2.234 7848