RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004
- To: "'Marc Schneiders'" <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Marilyn Cade'" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004
- From: "Kiyoshi I. Tsuru" <ktsuru@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:27:24 -0500
- Cc: "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20041117180315.Y22330firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcTNJubvqNP5YVLvSOuXZRbrk2b+IA==
I agree. The issue is important, and delicate. We should start discussing
this matter before the conf. call.
Kiyoshi I. Tsuru
Bello, Guzmán, Morales y Tsuru, S.C.
Agustín Manuel Chávez 1 - 104
Centro de Ciudad Santa Fe
01210, México, D.F.
Tel. +52 (55) 5292-5232
Fax +52 (55) 5292-5233
La información contenida en este mensaje de datos es confidencial,
constituye un secreto industrial en términos de la legislación vigente y se
encuentra dirigida exclusivamente al destinatario indicado en dicho mensaje.
Si usted recibe esta información por error o si usted no es el destinatario
del mensaje, favor de destruirlo inmediatamente, absteniéndose de leerlo,
reproducirlo, transmitirlo, almacenarlo, divulgarlo, revelarlo o usarlo de
manera directa o indirecta en cualquier forma y por cualquier medio. Muchas
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential,
privileged and intended for its recipient only. If you receive this mail by
mistake and/or if you are not the recipient thereof, please destroy it
immediately, abstaining yourself from reading, reproducing, transmitting,
storing, disclosing, revealing or using it, either directly or indirectly,
in any manner and by any means. Thank you very much.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marc Schneiders
Sent: Miércoles, 17 de Noviembre de 2004 12:10 p.m.
To: Marilyn Cade
Cc: 'Bruce Tonkin'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004
This is a pretty serious topic, I agree, as another elected rep. I do not
mind at all that we discuss this tomorrow. I would oppose though any attempt
to rush anything through tomorrow. Be it dismissing the whole WIPO II
request (which my constituency wouldn't mind as such) or taking some
position. We need serious discussion about this topic, which cannot be
accomplished in one teleconference as such short notice. I suggest we
discuss WIPO II on this list before we make _any_ decision. Thanks.
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, at 19:52 [=GMT-0500], Marilyn Cade wrote:
> Dear Bruce,
> As an elected rep to the BC on Council, I support the request for
> information and offer the following thought:
> The working group on WIPO II did not achieve consensus.
> Changes in policy by ICANN require consensus In the BC, we have
> received inquiries from our members, regarding the action of the ICANN
> regarding this issue.
> I want to support raisign this issue in Council to a priority level,
> and noting to the Board and staff that there is no support to make
> changes, given that there is no consensus in the working group.
> I welcome the opportunity to discuss this within Council and will be
> on Thursday's call. I have to leave at 3:30 EST, so ask that this
> issue be raised between 2 and 3:00 p.m. so that I can help to address it.
> Best regards,