[council] Text for resolution on .net criteria

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello All,

With regard to item 3 on the agenda, here is some proposed text for a
resolution with respect to the .net criteria.

"In response to the letter from Paul Verhoef on 31 March 2004 requesting
that the GNSO provide advice with a consensus statement defining the
criteria to be applied in the selection of a successor registry operator
for
.net, and in accordance with section 5.2 and 4.3 of the .net registry
agreement, the GNSO recommends that the following criteria (as detailed
in
the Final report of the GNSO subcommittee at
http://www.gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdf00001.pdf)
be applied:

- absolute criteria related to the targeting
- absolute criteria related to continuity
- absolute criteria related to policy compliance
- absolute criteria related to stability, security, technical and
financial
competence
- relative criteria related to promotion of competition
- relative criteria relating to stability, security, technical and
financial
competence
- relative criteria related to existing registry services, 

and provides the attached written report
(http://www.gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdf00001.pdf),
which includes all substantive submissions to the GNSO relating to this
recommendation, as required in section 4.3.1 of the .net agreement.
Absolute criteria are thresholds which an applicant is expected to meet,
and
relative criteria become relevant once absolute criteria are met and are
recommended as a basis for comparison and evaluation of competing
applications."

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin