ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Constituency statements by 12 Jan 2003

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Constituency statements by 12 Jan 2003
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:10:45 +1100
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcO7LR3iNNfE3bmXQU6bsnJ4UcFRRQABn+iQAHbBVdA=
  • Thread-topic: Constituency statements by 12 Jan 2003

Hello All,

An extension until 12 Jan 2003 seems sensible for the constituency
statements given the time of year.

Regards,
Bruce


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP [mailto:mcade@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Saturday, 6 December 2003 12:38 AM
> To: Marc Schneiders; Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Constituency representatives required 
> by 15 Dec 2003
> 
> 
> As I understand the role, the representative  mentioned is 
> responsible for the interface into the constituency itself 
> and helping the constituency to better understand the issues. 
> I do think that we need to try to move this topic ahead, and 
> so do support the need to begin the development of the 
> constituency statements even over the holiday period. I am 
> sympathetic to the challenge that Marc notes. It might be 
> feasible to support a one week extension to the submission of 
> the constituency reports -- to Jan 12.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Marilyn S. Cade
> 202-255-7348c
> mcade@xxxxxxx
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Schneiders [mailto:marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:33 AM
> To: Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] Constituency representatives required 
> by 15 Dec 2003
> 
> 
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, at 17:08 [=GMT+1100], Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> 
> > I recommend that each constituency endeavour to appoint their 
> > representative by Monday 15 Dec 2003, and provide the constituency 
> > statement to the ICANN staff manager by 5 January 2004.  Given the 
> > proximity to the holiday period around end of 
> December/early January 
> > in many countries, the sooner this work can commence the better.
> 
> Given the importance of the topic, I propose to add a week to 
> the final date of January 5. Many people will be off email at 
> the end of this month.  When they come back there will be 
> other things to take care of first. If we want good input 
> from the constituencies we need to give them a fair chance to 
> make up their mind and respond.
> 
> Marc Schneiders
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>