ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Terms of office for the GNSO Council

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Terms of office for the GNSO Council
  • From: "Milton Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:36:23 -0500
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks for raising this issue, Philip. We at NCUC had been 
assuming that two of the Council reps would be for one-year terms
and only one for two-year terms. This assumption was based on 
the idea that the re-expansion of constituency representation
to three was provisional. Which it may or may not be. If it is,
two one-years and a two-year seems better. Hope this gets cleared
up >really< quickly.

>>> "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> 11/12/03 07:28AM >>>
Council,
The ICANN by-laws section 3 introduces the concept of staggered terms of office 
for Council reps. Terms are two-year but there is rotation every year.

The transition article of the by-laws achieves this staggering in year one 
(2003) uniquely with one rep being elected for just one year. Thereafter all 
elections are held for two-year terms.

Further to the decision by the Board, there are currently three representatives 
per constituency. It is consistent with the concept of two-year terms, that 
there is initially one representative elected in 2003 for the one-time only 
one-year term, while the remaining two representatives are elected as usual for 
two-year terms.  

It is the intention of the Business Constituency to nominate representatives 
accordingly. We welcome comment from other constituencies on this approach.

Philip Sheppard
Marilyn Cade
Grant Forsyth




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>