<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] voting procedures
- To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Council (E-mail)" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] voting procedures
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:33:28 -0500
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have not found any issue that we have dealt with so far that didn't have
the flexibility to have at least a few days of review by the constituencies.
We should never be making any decisions that do not have such flexibility.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Council (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [council] voting procedures
Jeff,
you are quite right about consultation. We all want to do this and indeed
the old DNSO procedures laid all this out.
Nothing should change for normal issues.
The other flexibility is when there is a need to make a quick decision.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|