<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] voting procedures
- To: "Amadeu Abril i Abril" <Amadeu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] voting procedures
- From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:29:50 -0400
- Cc: "Council (E-mail)" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcODcQzi9UbXa1j6RiuEsDOBx8xOsgAAFKUA
- Thread-topic: [council] voting procedures
Perhaps it is possible to separate votes for elections and votes on policy?
202-255-7348c
mcade@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Amadeu Abril i Abril [mailto:Amadeu@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:24 AM
Cc: Council (E-mail)
Subject: [council] voting procedures
Bruce and all,
I think that in Carthage we should spend some minutes discussing better
ways of managing votes on resolutions. Amending resolutions on the fly
over the phone makes understanding the final picture very difficult.
Indeed, if we do have net access we always can see modified versions
(but we still should be able to find a ways to wathc the amendments
being introduced. Unfortunately not everybody can have mail/web access
during teleconfs. So we also need to revisit the written procedure for
voting. I dont think that we should require a confirmation by subsequent
teleconf. Perhaps this is so for the legal Board of a California
corporation, but the GNSO is an adivsory policy body, and whould enjoiy
more flexibility.
Amadeu
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|