<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] FW: FW: Revised Resolution regarding Verisign Registry Site Finder Service
- To: "Council (E-mail)" <council@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] FW: FW: Revised Resolution regarding Verisign Registry Site Finder Service
- From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:00:41 -0400
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcODKmDpY0E3Gy79TuKojB2NIpubSwAQQA3w
- Thread-topic: FW: Revised Resolution regarding Verisign Registry Site Finder Service
>
>
> Whereas, on September 15, 2003, VeriSign Registry introduced a wild
> card registry service into .com and .net zones that creates a
> registry-synthesized address record in response to look ups of domain
> names that are not present in the zone. This registry service changes
> the routing of traffic by directing traffic that would have otherwise
> resulted in a 'no domain' notification to the "sender" to a VeriSign
> operated web site with search results and links to paid > advertisements.
>
Whereas the IAB commentary published its architectural Concerns on the
> use of DNS wildcards on 19 September 2003.
>Whereas VeriSign Registry on 21 September 2003, responded to Paul
> Twomey, President and CEO, ICANN, acknowledging ICANN's advisory and
> declining to suspend the service until they (VeriSign) has an
> opportunity to collect and review available data.
>
Whereas the Security and Stability Advisory Committee, 22 September
> 2003,has published its recommendations regarding VeriSign's Introduction of
> Wild Card Response to Uninstantiated Domains within COM and NET on the ICANN
> web site at www.icann.org
>
> Therefore, the gNSO Council:
>
> Supports ICANN's actions to
> 1) monitor community reaction and experiences with the new registry
> service
> 2) request advice from the Security and Stability Advisory Committee
> and from the IAB on the impact of change introduced by the registry
> service of VeriSign
> 3) encourages broad participation by the community in the upcoming
> meeting hosted by the Security and Stability Advisory Committee
[>
>
> Pledges to
> 1) work cooperatively to ensure full opportunity to fully understand
> the service, its implications for the DNS, and any implications for the need
> for
Policy development within the scope of the gNSO.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|