<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] new gtld problem statement
- To: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] new gtld problem statement
- From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:59:28 -0400
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcNf5aur4eUq0V8uSKqHvfkebqkQNgJWH06QABhrIwA=
- Thread-topic: new gtld problem statement
Bruce, thanks for the edited version. We are definately on a better more fact
based track with this redraft; I have sent this to my internal DNS/architecture
team
for comment before providing my comments back. I'll try to get a response by
CoB Tuesday, if folks are around. Lots of vacations going on.
Thanks for your extensive editing. Sorry that we have put so much of this on
the Council Chair. I know it is a burden to take drafting of all the work of
Council on, as well as your role as chair, and your efforts are much
appreciated.
I hope we will soon see progress on hiring ICANN staff, who can take on much of
the drafting responsibilities.
MC
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 2:20 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] new gtld problem statement
Hello All,
Following the discussions in the last GNSO Council teleconference I have
revised the draft produced by Jeff Neuman to more generally state the
problem associated with software being used in the Internet that is not
compatible with new gtlds.
See attached marked up copy.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|