<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: vote on GNSO council composition...
- To: "council" <council@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] RE: vote on GNSO council composition...
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:32:02 +1000
- Cc: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcNleoDQvhQN/VOKSMqrpF0MAsRySgAj3V2g
- Thread-topic: vote on GNSO council composition...
Hello Ken,
As the vote was on a specific motion that was amended during the
teleconference, I will record the vote as stated during the teleconference with
Milton abstaining on behalf of Chun in the absence of receiving specific
instructions.
I will record in the minutes associated with the vote that Chun emailed the
following statement to the GNSO Secretariat during the call:
"I clearly support a resolution which make sure to have three
representatives per constituency."
I will convey the result of the motion, and the minutes associated with the
motion, to the ICANN Secretary for consideration by the ICANN Board.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, 18 August 2003 9:19 PM
> To: council; Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: re: vote on GNSO council composition...
>
>
> Mr Chairman...
>
> because this message was received while the council was still
> in conference, i would hope that the vote can amended to
> reflect chungs e-mail.
>
> if the council vote cannot be amended to reflect this then i
> would hope that chung's message be communicated along with
> the vote results
>
> Thank you for your consideration
>
> Ken Stubbs
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "GNSO SECRETARIAT" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "council" <council@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:39 AM
> Subject: TR: [council] RESOLUTION FOR TOMORROW'S TELECONFERENCE
>
>
> > Message received during GNSO Council teleconference, 14 August, and
> > only
> read after the teleconference.
> > GNSO Secretariat
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Chun Eung Hwi [mailto:ehchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Envoyé : jeudi 14 août 2003 14:31
> > À : gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Objet : Re: [council] RESOLUTION FOR TOMORROW'S TELECONFERENCE
> >
> >
> > To all,
> >
> > I clearly support a resolution which make sure to have three
> > representatives per constituency. If I could not be on the call, I
> > will give my proxy to Milton Mueller.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Chun Eung Hwi
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:17:55 +0200, GNSO SECRETARIAT
> > <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > [To: Council@xxxxxxxx]
> > >
> > > At the request of Antonio Harris, this mail is forwarded
> to the GNSO
> > > Council list
> > >
> > > mercredi 13 ao占 2003 16:57
> > > 占 gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> owner-council@xxxxxxxx Objet :
> > > RESOLUTION FOR TOMORROW'S TELECONFERENCE
> > >
> > >
> > > Bruce,
> > >
> > > I would like to present the following resolution
> > > to be discussed in the teleconference:
> > >
> > > Proposed Council resolution on Constituency
> representation to meet ICANN
> > > requirements on geographical diversity and informed
> decision-making
> > > Proposed by, in alphabetical order,
> > > Antonio Harris
> > > Ellen Shankman,
> > > Philip Sheppard
> > > Ken Stubbs
> > >
> > > Whereas,
> > > the Names Council resolution of 1st August 2002 called for "three
> > > representatives per Constituency on the GNSO Council".
> > >
> > > Whereas,
> > > ICANN core value 2.4 is:
> > > - "Seeking and supporting broad, informed participation
> reflecting
> > > the functional, geographic, and cultural diversity of the
> Internet
> > > at all levels of policy development and decision-making".
> > >
> > > Whereas,
> > > ICANN core value 2.7 is:
> > > - "Employing open and transparent policy development
> mechanisms that
> > > (i) promote well-informed decisions based on expert
> advice, and (ii)
> > > ensure that those entities most affected can assist in the policy
> > > development process."
> > >
> > > Whereas,
> > > by-law article XX.5.8 states:
> > > "In the absence of further action on the topic by the New Board,
> > > each of the GNSO constituencies shall select two
> representatives to
> > > the GNSO Council.." "..no later than 1 October 2003."
> > >
> > >
> > > The GNSO council resolves that:
> > >
> > > Two representatives per Constituency is inconsistent with
> ICANN core
> > > value 2.4 on geographic and cultural diversity within the
> > > constituency. With three representatives per constituency, the
> > > majority of ICANN regions ARE represented.
> > > With two, the majority of ICANN regions are NOT represented.
> > >
> > > .
> > > Two representatives per Constituency is inconsistent with
> ICANN core
> > > value 2.7 on well-informed decision making. Experience has shown
> > > that three representatives
> > > improves the constituencies ability to share the workload
> of a council
> > > member, to be able to participate in task forces of the
> council, and to
> > > more effectively communicate with multiple regions.
> > > .
> > > There is no evidence of increased effectiveness with two
> representatives
> > > rather than three.
> > > .
> > > And therefore the GNSO Council requests the Board to make
> two changes
> > > in its review timetable:
> > > 1. To change the transition article to allow three
> representatives per
> > > constituency on the GNSO Council until the end of the ICANN annual
> > > meeting
> > > 2004;
> > > 2. To perform a review of the GNSO council in or around June 2004.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Tony Harris
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chun Eung Hwi
> > General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone: (+82) 2-2166-2216
> > Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81 | pcs: (+82) 019-259-2667
> > Seoul, 158-600, Korea | eMail: ehchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|