GNSO Email Archives: [council]

ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Should we go ahead with the teleconference scheduled for 17 July 2003?

To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Should we go ahead with the teleconference scheduled for 17 July 2003?
From: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:30:25 +0200
Cc: council@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <318985B2C8109641B419FFE358B241F22552F0@cinpo03.dinslaw.com>
References: <318985B2C8109641B419FFE358B241F22552F0@cinpo03.dinslaw.com>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

ROESCH, LYNDA wrote:

I agree.

Don't know whether we all need to speak up, just a majority (ofheads/votes...), but in any case, I concur that holdiong a telconfwithout items in the agenda makes little sense.


Amadeu

References:
- RE: [council] Should we go ahead with the teleconference scheduled for 17 July 2003?
  - From: ROESCH, LYNDA

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>