|
Reserved Names Working Group (RN-WG)
Draft Agenda – Wednesday, 7 March 2007
-
Notes:
- Meeting is being recorded and transcribed
- Please identify yourself when
you speak so that the transcribers know to whom they should attribute
comments
- Listening through the speaker phone is fine, but when you
speak please use the handset.
- Review and approve agenda
- Review of and action on reports from WG subgroups
re. the role of reserved names (Members with names in bold font
have the lead.)
- Guidelines for brief reports
- Highlight only new info re. background & info.
Resources
- Focus primarily on role & expert consultation
sections
- Discuss role with the intent of reaching
WG consensus
- Discuss straw recommendations only if your sub-group
has reached rough consensus.
- Other categories of
reserved names
- ICANN and IANA related names – Tim Denton,
Mawaki Chango
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- Role
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Single and two-character
labels - Mike Rodenbaugh,
Neal
Blair, Alistair Dixon, Marilyn Cade, Patrick Jones
- Summary
of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- Role
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Controversial names – Tim Ruiz,
Marilyn Cade, Avri Doria
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- Role
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Geographic and geopolitical
names – Mike Palage,
Avri Doria, Jon Nevett
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- Role
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Timeline
- Remaining meetings
- Thursday, 8 March
- Thursday, 15 March
- Deadline for approval of final report: 15 March
- Report due date to the
GNSO Council and Dec05 PDP committee: 16 March
- Action items for next call
on 8 March
- Review the final report template to be distributed
by Chuck
- For each of the RN reserved
name reports:
- Complete a near-final draft report including
- Near final description
of consultation
with experts
- Final definition of role
- Final‘Straw’ recommendations
from
the
subgroup
for the
full
WG.
- Attempt
to
reach
rough
consensus
within
the
subgroup
on
the ‘straw’ recommendations
- If there is not rough
consensus,
state alternative recommendations.
- In Section
3 of each report,
provide recommendation summary
in the table format distributed by Chuck
on 5 March followed
with any appropriate narrative
text below the table.
- In cases where additional
work is recommended, include suggested
guidelines for additional work as applicable;
this should be inserted after the recommendations
summary table along
with any other
text provided there.
- Send revised report to the list
and to Glen for
posting at least one hour before the 8 March meeting
(earlier if possible)
- Be prepared to do the following at the 8
March
meeting:
- Briefly
(< 3
minutes)
summarize
updates
to
the
report
- Present ‘straw’ recommendations
for
discussion
and
consideration
of
the
full
WG
- Outline steps to finalize report
- Any Other Business
- Next meeting: Thursday, 8 March
- Times:
- Brussels Thu 7:00 PM CET
- Buenos Aires Thu 3:00 PM ART
- Cedar Rapidsw Thu 12:00 Noon CST
- Dublin Thu 6:00 PM GMT
- Hong Kong Fri 2:00 AM HKT
- London Thu 6:00 PM GMT
- Los Angeles Thu 10:00 AM PST
- New York Thu 1:00 PM EST
- Sacramento Thu 10:00 AM PST
- San Francisco Thu 10:00 AM PST
- Seoul Fri 3:00 AM KST
- Taipei Fri 2:00 AM CST
- Toronto Thu 1:00 PM EST
- Virginia/D.C. Thu 1:00 PM EST
- Wellington Fri 7:00 AM NZDT
- Teleconference
details
to
be provided
by Glen.
|