Re: [whois-sc] Accuracy as an issue area

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

to be frank, the RC is supports Bruces suggestion on how to move
forward.

Best,

tom

Am 10.10.2003 schrieb Bruce Tonkin:
> Hello Marilyn,
> 
> > 
> > I understand Steve Metalitz' suggestion and consider it a 
> > better approach to focus on Issue 5. It is consistent with 
> > the prioritization undertaken by the group. 
> 
> It is my current understanding that issue 5 is the first task of Task
> force 2.
> Task force 2 may have a one year duration, as it works through a work
> program of other tasks that were identified din the original WHOIS
> Privacy report.
> 
> It would seem that we should have a separate teleconference to discuss
> the other priority issue of accuracy.  I would prefer that we create a
> separate terms of reference for accuracy (task force 3).  The GNSO
> Council may decide to combine task force 3 with 2, but let's at least
> work on the priority issues of:
> - Data mining (relating to misuse for marketing)
> - Registrant knowledge of data collection and distribution practices
> (relating to privacy)
> - Accuracy
> as distinct issue areas.  
> 
> With regard to accuracy there are two distinct issues
> - verification of data at time of collection
> - maintenance of data over time
> 
> The recent WHOIS task force resulted in an improvement in maintenance
> (the WHOIS data reminder policy), but no outcome as yet on improved
> verification at time of data collection.
> 
> I will schedule a separate teleconference to focus on the accuracy
> issue.
> 
> Perhaps Steve in addition to his suggestions for task force 2, could
> review my first attempt at a task force 3 and consider what a separate
> task force on accuracy might look like.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w