Re: [registrars] Discussion of Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement [Tim Ruiz's motion].

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

No, not at all tim. I'm just sort of finding all of the procedural  
wrangling sort of mystifying. I think your motion is fine and we  
should proceed with it. We shouldn't let our bylaws become the issue  
when we have important policy questions like this one in front of us.  
Thanks for pushing this uphill for us.
---
Warm regards,

-Ross





Sent from my iPhone



On Nov 14, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ross,
>
> Sorry if I made you or anyone else uncomfortable about this. See my  
> note
> to Paul G. Hopefully that better explains why I made the motion.
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Discussion of Motion to adopt Tasting
> Position Statement [Tim Ruiz's motion].
> From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, November 14, 2007 12:41 pm
> To:
> Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> On 14-Nov-07, at 12:35 PM, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
>
> > I am equally uncomfortable
> I'm pretty uncomfortable with the fact that we're not even close to
> getting the Council a statement concerning the preferences of
> registrars related to the tasting issue.
>
> I'm pretty uncomfortable with the fact that its pretty likely that all
> of this parliamentary back and forth is totally confusing to most of
> our members and therefore likely to alienate someone not entirely
> familiar with our processes.
>
> I'm pretty uncomfortable with the fact that it continues to be the
> case that it takes us way to long to make really simple decisions.
>
> Can we just cut to the chase and find someone to help us write this
> document? Are there any volunteers? Jothan - is this work that you can
> help us with? Jeff? Anyone?
>
> Ross Rader
> Director, Retail Services
> t. 416.538.5492
> c. 416.828.8783
> http://www.domaindirect.com
>
> "To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
> - Erik Nupponen