Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Seems ok to me. Do we have to vote on this draft to formally accept it
and make it policy?

Best,

tom

Am 17.01.2007 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon:
> From ICANN for our review and comment.  Thanks.  Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:pritz@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:02 PM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon; Marie Zitkova
> Cc: Tim Ruiz; Cherstubbs@xxxxxxx; Tim Cole; Mike Zupke; Craig Schwartz;
> Dan Halloran
> Subject: Draft Procedure
> 
> Marie, Jon:
> 
> Please share this information with your constituency groups.
> 
> Attached is a draft procedure for considering gTLD registry proposals  
> for amendments to the Registry-Registrar Agreement (RRA). The  
> procedure is intended to provide opportunity for comment and  
> discussion and also provide certainty as to timeframe for consideration.
> 
> This draft arises from the new form of registry agreements that  
> requires ICANN approval for proposed changes to the RRA. This draft  
> procedure essentially provides for notice to registrars of proposed  
> changes, an opportunity for comment, and a forum for possibly  
> resolving areas of controversy. Not specifically described in the  
> procedure but included are public posting of major changes changes to  
> agreements as has been discussed in the recent past and Board  
> approval of changes to ICANN agreements in certain circumstances.
> 
> Please review and provide comment.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kurt
> 
> 
> Kurt Pritz
> 
> ICANN
> 4676 Admiralty Way, #330
> Marina del Rey. CA  90292
> 
> +1.310.301.5809 (office)
> +1.310.400.4184 (mobile)
> 




Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w