[registrars] Re: The Really Final version of Rules of Procedure ready for ballot;-} .

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob,

when are we going to vote on the whois statement Ross sent around. We
are already at least one week late on this.

Best,

tom



Am 05.08.2005 schrieb Robert F Connelly:
> Dear Members:
> 
> 
> [Please disregard the version of the Proposed Revised Rules of Procedure I 
> recently sent.  In the last days there were additional comments and one 
> amendment which the task force considered "friendly".  It changed the 
> endorser requirement for motions from five to three.  The July 22 version 
> is the one on which we will ballot.  We are much indebted to Jon Nevett for 
> his prompt and fastidious attention to this task.]
> 
> [Original text follows:]
> 
> Attached you will find copies of the original Rules of Procedure and the 
> revised version approved by the By-Laws Task Force.  I have attached them 
> in both .doc and .rft formats.  There were no unfriendly amendments.
> 
> This Motion requires a majority of those voting to be approved.  The 
> process is being conducted in accordance with the original Rules of 
> Procedure.
> 
> I intend to post the ballot on Sunday, 7 August 2005.  I will leave the 
> ballot open until Monday, 15 August 2005 at 22:00 Pacific Daylight 
> Time.  The ballot will read as follows:
> 
> It has been moved that the revised Rules of Procedure recommended by the 
> By-Laws Task Force be approved.  Do you agree?
> 
> Yes
> No
> Abstain.
> 
> end quote:
> 
> Respectfully submitted,
> Robert F. Connelly
> Secretary
> Registrars Constituency 




Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w