Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois TF 1 & 2 recommendations

["Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 01:03 AM 1/20/05, Thomas Keller wrote:
> Just one remark:
>
> Prescribing the form and scope of *my* legal agreements with *my* registrants
> is inappropriate and without precedent under current agreements. This entire
> clause should be removed from the recommendations.

Dear Thomas and others:  Thomas' posting directs us toward more careful 
analysis of the Motion as now drafted.

Many years ago, I was part of a small, on campus Toastmasters Club.  One of 
our assignments was to deliver a speech to an antagonistic or hostile audience.

To do so, and to hopefully coopt at least a few of the listeners, it is 
necessary to put ones self into the shoes of the audience and carefully 
*listen* to our own speech with an open mind.

I fear that our present draft shows tunnel vision and blind self 
interest.  I fear that it will fall on deaf ears as presently drafted.

Cordially, BobC


> should be changed to:
>
> Prescribing the form and scope of a *registrars* legal agreements with *its*
> registrants is inappropriate and without precedent under current agreements.
> This entire clause should be removed from the recommendations.
>
> Best

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
New Email Address from 9 January 2005
rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx