[registrars] Clarification of the current ballot

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just so there's no misunderstandings, please see the original motion that
resulted in this ballot. Given the way the ballot is presented, and the
motion it represents, a vote of NO on this ballot is in effect a vote FOR
option 1 below.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 6:59 PM
To: 'Registrars Constituency'
Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion to amend voting procedures.


> 
> MOTION:
> I hereby move that we have a runoff election between the two 
> proposals with the highest percentage of the prior vote, specifically:
> 
> 1. Post individual voting results, but only at the conclusion 
> of the voting period.
> 2. Continue to post individual voting results, during the 
> entire voting period.
> 
> end quote:
> 

I endorse this motion.

Tim Ruiz