ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Verisign batch pool advisory

  • To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bhavin Turakhia'" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Verisign batch pool advisory
  • From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:13:05 +0530
  • In-reply-to: <01e201c4ab9b$ab39d0b0$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcSrneQz7GqvCCdnRriOoEzzepHKcgAR6OQg

> So while option 1 may not be ideal either, for now, it will 
> make the usefulness of the *phantom* registrars pretty much nil.
> 
> Also, with Network Solutions' and Tucows' intention to offer 
> a secondary market service to registrants with 
> expiring/deleting names, far less valuable names are going to 
> actually hit the drop list anyway. So I think the future 
> value of the batch pool is going to change dramatically.

My greater concern is that implementing 1 will result in a situation where
icann will not meet its budget sinc everyone will match the forgiveness
criteria.

Im still out on the road all of this week and will only be back in office
after 2 weeks ..... And therefore will be a lil quiet :)

-B




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>